I get the fun part of engineering this but can't put aside that it doesn't bring that much new feature, a thermometer, international time, more advanced chronometer. That's all thing that I don't really care about.
On the downside, you loose the cheap aspect of this watch and the battery life is divided by 7. From 7 years to supposedly a full year.
I buy a f91w because it cost less than 5€ and I don't care to break it or get it stolen.
Man I wish Casio would make a cheap fitness band in one of their entry level watch bodies. A miband in the shape of a F91W with oled and 3 programmable buttons for $40 would be amazing.
Bluetooth could have such a tiny power draw if they would just have lower update rates.
I don't see any reason things like watches and tracking tags in some couldn't have 10yr life on a coin cell, or like 30 years with an LTO you charge monthly.
Deep sleep currents can be in the nanoseconds, and we only need power for a few milliseconds every minute to transmit an "I'm here" beacon.
Step counts and heart rates are different, but even that can be optimized a lot if you don't need 100% perfect data
If you missed this detail, they've also designed a replacement LCD which adds a few carefully-chosen segments and symbols. The end result still looks very similar to a stock watch, but is much more flexible: https://www.crowdsupply.com/oddly-specific-objects/sensor-wa...
I respect these developers spending months and months to do something really not necessary and just for fun. I doubt they would make millions selling this so it is purely for their entertainment. I hope to find a hobby project to dedicate myself like these people one day.
yeah sounds nuts, but it's probably not from selling the watch, but their value will be in learning about how to make lower power small electronics for someone else is my guess. But on the face of it, doesn't make sense.
I get the fun part of engineering this but can't put aside that it doesn't bring that much new feature, a thermometer, international time, more advanced chronometer. That's all thing that I don't really care about.
On the downside, you loose the cheap aspect of this watch and the battery life is divided by 7. From 7 years to supposedly a full year.
I buy a f91w because it cost less than 5€ and I don't care to break it or get it stolen.
I agree with your points.
Where are you getting a genuine F91-W for 5€? A replacement 71604002 band costs me €8!
I would also like to know this. I got mine for 12€ a while back and it looks to be going for around 20€ now.
Walmart, they regularly go on clearance, no clue why.
Man I wish Casio would make a cheap fitness band in one of their entry level watch bodies. A miband in the shape of a F91W with oled and 3 programmable buttons for $40 would be amazing.
They do, albeit without a heart rate monitor.
https://www.casio.com/us/watches/casio/product.ABL-100WE-1A/
With a heart rate monitor it's considerably more expensive.
Would gladly pay $200 for that.
I tried garmin, apple watch, whoop, and a couple other heart rate trackers recently… they’re very very uncomfortable when coming from a Casio!
Smart is such a buzzword.
What's so smart about something that draws many times as much power?
Sure we can strive to do more with less power? It's been decades since this watch was first released.
Bluetooth could have such a tiny power draw if they would just have lower update rates.
I don't see any reason things like watches and tracking tags in some couldn't have 10yr life on a coin cell, or like 30 years with an LTO you charge monthly.
Deep sleep currents can be in the nanoseconds, and we only need power for a few milliseconds every minute to transmit an "I'm here" beacon.
Step counts and heart rates are different, but even that can be optimized a lot if you don't need 100% perfect data
Nice. I just wish they chose a watch with more pixels for the display. Perhaps they’ll consider doing another one as a successor.
If you missed this detail, they've also designed a replacement LCD which adds a few carefully-chosen segments and symbols. The end result still looks very similar to a stock watch, but is much more flexible: https://www.crowdsupply.com/oddly-specific-objects/sensor-wa...
That is really cool - also over 800 days is petty awesome for a "smartest" watch.
This is sensorwatch.com and it is nice. It has been around for a while.
I respect these developers spending months and months to do something really not necessary and just for fun. I doubt they would make millions selling this so it is purely for their entertainment. I hope to find a hobby project to dedicate myself like these people one day.
yeah sounds nuts, but it's probably not from selling the watch, but their value will be in learning about how to make lower power small electronics for someone else is my guess. But on the face of it, doesn't make sense.
I wish they'd pick a better base watch, eg F108, W217.
Basically the 2024 wannabe terrorist dream come true!